Gerrie Schipske for City Council.

The voters of Long Beach wisely approved a limit of two terms (8 years) for members of the City Council. As a result, in 2006, the voters of the 5th Council District will have the opportunity of selecting a new councilmember. Gerrie Schipske is a candidate for the 5th Council District in 2006. This site will provide information on Gerrie's campaign for City Council. You can contact Gerrie Schipske at gerrie@schipske4council.com.

My Photo
Name: Gerrie Schipske
Location: Long Beach, California

Local Roots. Local Values. Gerrie Schipske's grandparents came to Long Beach in the late 1940's. Her parents met at the Pike and married at St. Lucy's Church. They held their wedding reception in Silverado Park. Gerrie was born in 1950 at the Long Beach Naval Hospital. She has worked and lived in Long Beach for 29 years. Her three children attended Long Beach public schools and Long Beach City College. Gerrie has a distinguished career of public service at the city, state and congressional levels. She has served for over 15 years on Long Beach City committees, commissions and boards -- including the Board of Health and Human Services, the Joint Powers Authority for the CSU Headquarters, and the Queensway Bay Committee that guided the development of the Aquarium of the Pacific. In 1992, she was elected to the Long Beach City College Board of Trustees. She has won the nomination of her political party three times for state and federal offices. Gerrie Schipske is the founder of Long Beach Cares... and RxforLongBeach.com.

Gerrie Schipske for City Council. She's running. For us. For Long Beach.
Posted by Hello

Wednesday, June 22, 2005

No New Taxes

What Part of No Taxes Does the Council Not Understand?

Having a degree in history can be a curse sometimes. I kinda keep track of what has happened in Long Beach. Somehow I remember that the voters made it clear that they do not want a utility users tax. So why or why are several council members spending time..or actually asking city management to spend time..to determine if the utility tax can be increased to help make up some of budget shortfall.

Wrong. Wrong. Before we go about taking more of the taxpayers' money..are we all sure that we have cut every bit of excess and fat out of management and the council staff?

And please have the decency to call it what it is. It is not a utility tax -- it won't be used to improve the utilities in the city -- it will be used to pay for things the council isn't paying for. If it is for public safety --then call it that. I doubt the voters will go for a public safety tax because the logical question is: what are you spending my taxes on that you cannot afford to pay for public safety? Huh?

Stop the foolish talk about increasing the utility tax and get back to work cleaning your own house. Consolidating major departments to decrease the amount of duplicate administrative staff would be a start...but I am sure there is more.

Voters are historians too when it comes to taxes and those who tax. They don't forget even if council members leave the council and try to run for higher office.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home