Gerrie Schipske for City Council.

The voters of Long Beach wisely approved a limit of two terms (8 years) for members of the City Council. As a result, in 2006, the voters of the 5th Council District will have the opportunity of selecting a new councilmember. Gerrie Schipske is a candidate for the 5th Council District in 2006. This site will provide information on Gerrie's campaign for City Council. You can contact Gerrie Schipske at gerrie@schipske4council.com.

My Photo
Name: Gerrie Schipske
Location: Long Beach, California

Local Roots. Local Values. Gerrie Schipske's grandparents came to Long Beach in the late 1940's. Her parents met at the Pike and married at St. Lucy's Church. They held their wedding reception in Silverado Park. Gerrie was born in 1950 at the Long Beach Naval Hospital. She has worked and lived in Long Beach for 29 years. Her three children attended Long Beach public schools and Long Beach City College. Gerrie has a distinguished career of public service at the city, state and congressional levels. She has served for over 15 years on Long Beach City committees, commissions and boards -- including the Board of Health and Human Services, the Joint Powers Authority for the CSU Headquarters, and the Queensway Bay Committee that guided the development of the Aquarium of the Pacific. In 1992, she was elected to the Long Beach City College Board of Trustees. She has won the nomination of her political party three times for state and federal offices. Gerrie Schipske is the founder of Long Beach Cares... and RxforLongBeach.com.

Gerrie Schipske for City Council. She's running. For us. For Long Beach.
Posted by Hello

Friday, July 08, 2005

One More Reason to Say No to an LNG Plant in the Port


London, Long Beach and the world of terror

How horrible for the people of England. The recent terrorism in the UK defies any description or reasoning. It is important for Long Beach to re-think any possibility of painting a bright red target sign on this City by positioning an LNG plant smack dead in the Port (pictured to the right). Yes, there are other things in the Port that could go boom, but LNG is particularly dangerous and why add fuel to the fire (to use a bad pun in this case)?

Someone needs to convince me why we know better than the State of California which did a report on the siting of LNG plants and decided the Port of Los Angeles (inches away from Long Beach) was in an earthquake fault area and was not a good place to have something like an LNG plant.

Also, supposedly if we build an LNG plant our gas bills will go down? I think that only works if we then build a system to convert LNG (liquid) to gas because that's what our homes are piped for.

When it comes to safety, I say let's err on the side of caution. Sure, sure, some of you will say, well then we shouldn't have buses and subways and trains because that's what the terrorists went after. Yeah, that is true. But I say in response, let's not tempt them to try something different and more spectacular.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home